CONTRADICTIVE MONADOLOGY AND UNIVERSAL BIOCHARTOGRAPHY

                      
CONTRADICTIVE MONADOLOGY AND UNIVERSAL        
         BIOGEOMETRIC CHARTOGRAPH

―CONTRADICTIVE ELEMENTARY UNITE―

NOTATION: A. This work is an elaboration and recapitulation of my earliest works: “Contradiction is Motion and Materiality” published at 1983 by Dodoni and “Logic, Language and Action” at 1994 published by Dodoni.

B. This work is an effort to answer to the following inquiries:
1. How a contradictive elementary unite, a contradictive identity and a contradictive rationalism, are logically possible.
2.  How universe, as an open system, is logically possible.
3.  How motion and change as real and not phenomenal, are logically possible.
4. How universal unity of great and small, (mega and micro), is logically possible.
5.  How intellect, intuition, conscience and aesthetics are logically possible.
6. How universe as an intercommunication “plot”, where every-thιng in it, would be and behave as a message, is logically possible.
7.  How this communication plot is possible to exist as an ontological language, that is, as a Contradictive Bio-geometry.

INTRODUCTION:

1. The world (material reality) exists by two ways, which though being opposite, they do not refute eatch-other, but they integrate to a contradictive unity.
2.  This exists as many separated specific finite events and as a unity (a whole).
3.   From the point of view of the specific finite events, to which we only can be in touch, the world is always a finite event.  
4.   Every finite event has as limits the other specific finite events to which interact every moment, inter-form and inter-terminate, in a narrow or broad relation.
5. There is a quantitive scale that expresses this inter-termination and inter-formation. This departs from the deeply inside self-termination of the specific One, passes to the inter-formation and inter-termination with the events of the nearby environment, gradually to the farther and faraway ones and finally with the whole (the universe), which is the Other-self, that forces the specific-one continuously to change.  This way the specific and finite One comprises potentially a face of infinite. That is, every material event changing continuously cannot be absolutely determined for its absolute beginning or ending.
6. The world, as a Whole, is a Unity of all these inter-terminations and inter-actions,  which every moment is Unique  and  Always Different.   So, the world itself, as a Whole, exists overpassing continuously itself.  That is, to be Always Itself-Being continuously Other. This is the Contradiction as Essence Itself, the Potentiality (the dynamic base of the world), the Evolution as essence itself and finally the Materiality itself. The world itself, as a Whole, is a continuous explosion of change.
8.   So from the point of view of the continuously changing specific events, but also from the point of view of the whole, Past and Future do not really exist, only Present exists. Present (Now) ExistsAlways-NotExisting, because in its every moment is Other (different). It is the zero edge of the fading (perishing) present, which tending to zero, tends simultaneously to infinite Being-Always- Other. So Time, being always “Now”, do not exist as duration.  Duration as Time Itself is a deterministic illusion.
9. The whole (the material universality) as a continuity of the specific separated events, is the abstract expression of their interaction generality. This situation in its higher grade though, over-grades the abstract generality to a higher specification, which is the Eternal Motion Itself (Motion as a specific essence).
    The world consists of unlimited separated evens, which the more static and stably are considered, the more specific they are, but in their supreme stability, that is, in their minimum time duration, the stability is overpassed to the eternal motion, which needs another calculation and logical approach.
10.  There are two ways of logical approach to the material reality, which inter-extend each-other so that the specific enters inside the abstract and oppositely. This way the abstract and the specific compose a unity to a higher specification, which responds to the Eternal Evolution –the Motion as an specific essence–.

                              event and position

11.  Every event exists in a position because of the flow-antiflow process of under-events in this position, which make the event a collapse-composing reality. So every event in a position has a specific way to emits-receiving under-events (messages) to and from universe.  This has as a result, a specific intertermination-interformation and opposition-unity of every specific event with its environment, which is the way the event “perceives”  the world.  
12.  This perception means that every event emits-receiving messages (under-events), which arrive to universe passing by all the events of the environment and interacting with them, brings the difference to its formal position changing itself.
13.  There is a scale of the specific events “perception” for the world, which scale emits-receiving flow-antiflow of messages, which depart from the confrontation, (interreaction-intertermination) deeply inside the event itself (self-termination),  passes to the confrontation to the near-by events, next to the farther ones and finally to the Universe as a Whole itself, (the Eternal-Other-Self, the Universal Reply), which forces the event to change continuously. This interacting-perception differs with the distance of the events travel, (being so bigger as farther they travel).
14.  Every confrontation is a junction of depart-returning messages; the messages traveling to the universe reform the events of the environment they meet, being simultaneously  reformed  by them;  and finally  returning back, reforms  the event of departure.  So after an unconstrained process of gradual departure-returning messages to all events of universe, the specific event transforms the universe being transformed also simultaneously by the universe.
15. The above means, that every message performs unconstrained “cycles” of departure-returning, composing a scale of differntiality, which transforming the universe is transformed by that.
16.   Every cycle of the departing-returning messages is a junction which puts the limits of the event specification.  The message though, passing by all the junctions of differentiality, terminates itself to its opposite view.  The integration of the event self- “perception” is realised when the event itself has been overpassed, because the transformation of its furthest opposite, having gradually been absolutely similar to it, do not exist any more as itself being as Other.    

17.  During this process of message exchanging, (emit-receiving messages to the universe and from that), the bigger distance messages travel the more different they return, so they verify the event of the departure, but simultaneously being different, they falsify it also. That has a result, the event to be verified a little further from the position it was.  It is so that the event itself to depart from the same position of itself and to return-getting away, enters to a continuous identification to itself. This identification departing from the greatest one (as the eternal departure) and gradually getting smaller, ends to the minimum identification (where exactly is the position of the eternal return). Between these extreme positions there are unconstrained junction-positions of departure-returning, where the event is able to exist as related and similar to itself. In the two extreme positions though, the event do not exist because it has fallen in the under substance of the world, the immediate and immobile (the Potentiality Existing level of the world).    
      All this process could be named contradictive identity, which I will try to make a full description in the following work.

                    point, straight course, space and time  

18. The world to evolve really and its every moment not to be repeated (to be unique), should be an open system, whose terms should be self-overpassing (being of contradictive nature). So the language to express this reality, should consist of contradictive elements. To make understood how an element would be a contradictive one, it is necessary to bring in mind the elements of Euclidean Geometry, which are just opposite to the contradictive elements. These are not simply elements of a geometry, but from a philosophical aspect, elements of a cosmological lingual system.      
19. In Euclidean Geometry, point, straight line and space, are ideal meanings, being each other separated and motionless “in the state of rest”. The Space is of three-dimensions,  whose  all  directions  expand  to  the  infinite;  this  is  considered  to be separated from all the others but it can contain all of them, (its existence though do not depend  on these).  This could exist  and  be conceivable  without  all the others it contains, as an empty space, being finally an idea. Straight line expanding to infinite never meets itself; the point is ideal having no dimensions. Regardless something happens  to  any  one  of them,  nothing  is necessary to happen  to the others.  On the contrary, if we suppose the existence of a «Contradictive Geometry», this would have as basic characteristic the innate mobility and correlation of the elements it consists.   
    Space, time, straight line and point, altogether compose a unique event in a continuous motion, interaction and inter-formation, being everyone in a specific condition because the rest of all the others demand to.
20. Let’s see the meaning of this preposition: A point in the state of rest, can not be considered, but moving rectilinearly and normally in space; because of that, the accomplishment of straight line is not the ideal event, we imagine and sketch it on a flat paper. Straight line in this case, is a straight and normal course of a moving point in space, and space, to be real (not ideal), has the continuous rotation as a state of rest.
    Space, for any point moving rectilinearly and normally, is an unconstrained series of similar points, composing a unity.  These points differ each others in their direction and the departure spot, at the specific moment all these are considered to depart simultaneously composing the specific space. In other words, the moving rectilinearly and normally point, should do so in a space consisting by other similar but in different direction points; that’s why “the state of rest” of the space in relation to the moving-One, rectilinearly and normally point, is a rotation (there is one more reason which we will realise during the process of this work). So it is necessary for the moving-One, to accomplish gradually its course upon the crossing positions of the Other similar moving points, the space consists of. These crossing positions of the One’s course upon the ideate courses of the Many Others, is the way the straight and normal course of the One is recorded upon the rotating space.  The rotating space falsifies the straight course of the One because it is accomplished on the Many-Others “course-plot” in a curved form. (The One “intends” to accomplish straight and normal motion, but the rotation of space transforms its course to curved).
21. To have a better comprehension of space, point and straight-motion relation process, let’s make a mental experiment:   Suppose the rectilinearly and normally moving point, «intends» to accomplish an absolute straight course. This moving point to catch up the space rotation, should accelerate so its course to be «straighten up»;  so the moving-One to accomplish this task should cover any supposed distance A―B, instantaneously. Every «rectilinear» course of a point moving instantaneously, looses its course sense, because being instantaneous, it has been expanded to all universe and has returned back to its former position simultaneously.  After this remark we have this paradox: the instantaneous acceleration of this point, don’t permit acceleration and motion, because the instantaneous expands to all universe, being simultaneously everywhere; so this is in the departure and arrival position simultaneously. This is an explosive change to infinite and return instantaneously back to zero point.   So this point being of zero and infinite size, is at the same time, the instantaneous and motionless, One and Many; this is the contradiction itself, the potentiality level of the whole.

22.  This paradox could reveal the relativity of space, point, straight-course and time, where the behaviour of all these, depend on their relation to All Others, forming this way a Unity.  The size of the point is every time so big, as its speed permits and due to its speed, the motion course recorded in space “straightens up”.  The more its speed increases, the greater space is limited and included in the “curvedness” of the course “straightness”, and smaller the size of the point becomes, demands an appropriate rotation of the moving point around itself.  This way, point is a rotating anti-space that expands-unrolling into space, as space rolls-folding and rotates reversely, diving into the point. For this reason, the crossing positions of the course of the One, upon the courses of the Many-Others, which compose the corresponding space to the course of the One-point (moving normally and rectilinearly), forms a crossing position scale. This scale departs from the position of the One crossing one-Other, and gradually unfolds to positions of crossing-together two-Others, three-Others …etc, arriving to a position of the scale, where the One crosses all Many-Other courses simultaneously. The Point moves-expanding to the Space and the Space rotates-diving into the point, acting reversely to the point and composing together a contradictive  unit.

23. The previous process is similar to the following: The rectilinearly and normally moving-One, crossing gradually the Many-Others courses, (having everyone of them separately a different direction), once will reach the position to cross the course of the One (of itself), having a reverse direction to the One of its departure, being at this moment the centre of the hypothetic rotating space; Hence from this position, it will begin to «return», crossing this way its own course and finally it will coincide reversely upon its own course.  This process we described, is the space which corresponds to the moving-One, composing an open system, because the integration of this return is accomplished only to its direction, but has not return exactly to the hypothetic position of this point departure, since there is not an absolute one of this kind. (This preposition will be determined again, because it is very critical the space not be a closed system).     Regarding carefully this process, we could realise that the course of the One, crossing the courses of Many-Others, is finally the same to the One crossing its own course;   That is so,  because the “curvedness” of the straight course, presupposes the straight course once to begin crossing its own course.

24.  Space, following the curved (straight and normal) motion of the One reversely, moves-rotating, expands-constricting, departs-returning. It is so that space in relation and together with the moving-One point, behaves as a unit.   The  only  space  not  obliged to have a motion course, but only palpitates, is the Whole.  Because palpitation being instantaneous is not a course, existing potentially and can not be terminated as any other essence, but as the contradiction nude.  that means: to have all attributes and none, being the Instantaneous and Motionless at the same time.  When space is not a whole, but a conventional one, the element of instantaneous disappears from surface and hides in the underground, being indefinite and forgotten.  In extreme and boundary situations though, it shows its face astonishing us.  Except of the «absolute» space, appearing as the contradiction nude, any other conventional space is curved, responding to its related point and its related «straight» course, having a paracentral oscillation. This way the point is real, having size, rotation and its straight course owes to have a curvedness, responding to the course of the point and its size.  This space is constricted-rotating and limited by the curvedness of its straight course on one hand, and the rotation and size of the point on the other.  So there is space and anti-space; the space is constrained by the course curvedness of the point and the anti-space by the rotation of the point around itself.  From a contradictive point of view though, both spaces together compose one event: “the contradictive space” which is inseparable from the events it is related with. Time in this Time-space event, is  the  fluidity of point frequency in the specific position and Space is the expanse area of the point rotation round it self, in relation to a specific system of reference. This contradictive space, even might be characterised as a space-time event, where time would be the frequency of the points fluidity in position and space would be their wave length.
25.  The specific space departs-returning, not being able to verify absolutely itself, because, as we have notice, the moving-One-Point responding to this space, moving forward returns once to the direction of its own course, verifying the direction, but never absolutely the hypothetic position of its departure. This way, it verifies positions of itself relatively near its hypothetic departure position, but not absolutely; the returning point meets its position, touching it more and more but never being exactly upon that. (The absolute departure is an ideal one and can only be conceived as the immobile and instantaneous, the absolutely vacant and simultaneously the absolutely full). This way the moving-One collapses-composing itself a little farther from the previous position, moving forward.  From a contradictive point of view, motion is the course of the collapsing-compositive process of the events. This departing-returning course, responds to a process of an unlimited series of denial-verifications, that departs from the one of absolute verification and at the same time absolute falsification,  where  space  departs-returning  instantaneously as contradiction-nude, and passing by all the positions of possible verifying-falsifying relation, ends to the absolute falsification, being at the same time, the absolute verification which is again the instantaneous and the contradiction-nude. There, space is always different and potentially, has all forms and simultaneously no one. All intermediate positions of departure-returning, verifying-falsifying, collapsing-composing, situation represent a specific and conventional space, which although is constrained, has undetermined limits, because the moving-One has not an absolutely specific departing position and its limits are continuously changing.  These limits, are always related to some departure of the moving-One, presenting itself as an ultimate unite at the moment.  This way the specific and constrained space, is at the same time open containing potentially the infinite.  

Explicative note:

26. Every rectilinearly and normally moving point has the syndrome of curvedness; henceforth a moment, it must create crossing positions upon its own course, by itself.  These positions are where the moving-One repeats itself more than one time; this way a scale of positions gradualness is created, departing from the position of zero repetition, passes all the possible (one, two, three. . ) positions of repetition and ends to the infinite one. (Zero and infinite positions of this scale respond to the contradictive-instantaneous).
    Now let’s see again this process from an other related view: The moving-One point performs an unconstrained number of departure-returning cycles, intending to verify itself. This way it terminates two spaces to which every time responds. (The great one, responds to the course curvature of the moving-One, and the small one responds to the perimeter of One’s rotation round itself, being its size).  These cycles depart from the one which is never accomplished, because it has never departed, and ends to the one that never accomplished because it will never return.  (Both of these cycles compose the zero-infinite unit, responding to the instantaneous).   Between these two space relating positions, an unconstrained number of departure-returning relating positions exists, where the event is not verified absolutely but in relation to its falsification.  At these positions the moving-One (the point) crosses its ideal course but never absolutely. (We call it ideal, because it is not there itself to be met again, but it has passed by this spot, creating positions of departing-returning repetition). This one never passes exactly by the position once passed, but gradually touches more and more the ideal spot of departure and verifying it gradually, creates a scale of verification-falsification relating positions. These positions depart from the greater falsification and smaller verification of this One and arrives to greater verification and smaller falsification.  

27. The moving-One (point) departs-returning continuously to universe, terminating the size of the space curvedness course in relation to the size of the position rotation around itself. (The smaller position self rotation, responds to a
greater course curvedness, containing the adequate universal space). This relation departs from zero size position and infinite size space and passing by all position and space relations, (the bigger position, smaller the space becomes), arrives to a zero space and infinite position. (As we have noticed, at this extreme situation we have the instantaneous and immobile simultaneously, with all the consequents following this relation).

28. Accepting the existence of an unconstrained number of departing-returning points, which move rectilinearly and normally, it is necessary every-One of these to pass from the positions of all the Other points and all the Other points gradually (one by one) to pass from the position of the One. This way we have the accomplishment of Many Others by the course of the One passing through them, and simultaneously, the accomplishment of the One, by the alternating Many Others courses, through the One.  So  on one hand,  there is  a series  of positions, having a periodic repetition of different points through every one position and on the other hand, one position having  a series of different frequency repetition courses of Many Other points through the same position. (These are the different crossing positions, of the course of the One by itself). They are two opposite quantity, flow-antiflow position scales: the One through Many-Others and Many-Others through the One. This has as a result the creation of a spherical order position system, with pole A, being the departure of  the One and arrival of  Many-Others and anti-Α, being the departure of many Others and arrival of the One. In this process (being the contradictive unit we have noticed before), the moving-One exists exactly where it consists by the anti-coursing of Many-Others. This anti-coursing, consists by the courses of similar Many Others, having everyone a different direction, that is a different angle of crossing, (something we accepted at the beginning of this concept, as an element of difference between the similar Many-Others).  So these points arriving differently to every position of this quantity scale, compose the One as rotating and different every moment and simultaneously Many-Others exist the way they are, because the One counter-moves with a different repetition frequency (of its course-crossing by itself) through every One of Many-Others separately.  We have noticed that the moving-One departing from the position A, arrives in position anti-A (being Many-Others), where the greatest crossing state of the One’s course by itself exists. At the same time, position anti-A, is the departure of Many-Others, where they exist as the anti-course and the anti-moving-One. Many-Others, as we shall see, during unfolding this model, are every moment and in every position One else, –a different Other–, having a different direction, because it arrives there having some other spot as departure in a different quantity scale,  from the unlimited number our world consist of.  Between positions A and anti-A, a gradual scale of flow-antiflow relating positions of the One’s course and Many-Others anti-course exists.  Every position, although is an identity having its own character, is simultaneously an inseparable part of the scale of the whole.     A scale of positions is a specific identity, being a different relation of the One and Many-Others, flow-antiflow process;   This scale of positions, is simultaneously a partaker of the whole as a unity. Whole is a contradictive unity, being an ideal “scale board” of positions and point activity, being the matter we try to terminate in all its contradictive dimensions in this work.

29. As we noticed, this scale has an unconstrained number of point departure-returning positions.  Every position is a result of different flow-antiflow relation of One and Many-Others moving points. This way every position have a different character with a definite emission-receiving of a specific event, departing for universe and returning to position. Every position is a vortex, where Many-Others dive, entering from one side and spring out by the other side, because the One contra-moves terminating, by the frequency of its repetition, the quantity and the wave-length of Many-Others. Any removal from position to position, modifies all relations. Any character of modification in the position of a receiving-emissiοn point, changes its scale position, moving exactly  to the justified  position  by its  receiving-emission character. At the poles of the scale, there the unrepeated and the instantaneous repetition is, which reveals the infinite character of an open system, in all events of our world. Since every scale takes a specific character of emit-receiving-flow-antiflow position, its infinite character withdraws, carrying away zero element too. Then the infinite element of the scale, is modified to an infinite number of scales,  changing face.  Although every scale is characterised by the attributes we referred to, simultaneously has a departure reference to a different position in every other parallel scales; That is why it has an unconstrained number of faces and dimensions, containing one face of the whole, (from its evolutional point of view), until the moment of a specific research.  Although it seems that two different situations exist, both are the same event from an other point of view; it is remarkable to notice this detail, to make clear that the departure-returning of the emission-receiving of messages in position, is not a closed system but an open one.

Explicative note:

30. The moving-One, we supposed that its course crossing by itself, is “the cause of the –One and Many-Others– contradictive relation process” (coursing-anticoursing), in its complete integration is the instantaneous-immobility potentiality. This potentially is, the operation of the Whole, which being instantaneous is hidden. That operation of the whole exists in the depth of this hidden form of the world, as an instantaneous palpitation (expansion-shrinking). (This is the motionless-instantaneous crossing-distances of no size parts situation and zero-infinite unity). When we intend for distinguished units, moving rectilinearly and normally, the instantaneous disappears from surface hiding in depth and the relation of the moving-One and Many-Others counter-motion comes in surface, where the existence of the moving-One depends on the counter-motion of Many-Others and reversely.
   The hypothetic leaping removal of the One, from position to position, which we could imagine as the ultimate removal distance on hypothetic axis with poles A-antiA, of the hypothetic flow-antiflow sphere is a result of the anti-moving course of Many-Others.   This anti-moving course of Many-Others, travelling to the faraway limits of the sphere (and forward to Universe) returns to meet and verify the  moving One.  The returning Many-Other elements, meet the moving-One in its direction from position «α» to position «β» on the axis A-antiA;  The Many-Others moving reversely to position «β» passing by «γ», («next» position of moving-One course on the hypothetic A-antiA poles axis). (I insist to notice this again, because of the importance, that Many-Others contra-moving, compose the leaping removal of the One from position «α» to position «β» on the axis A-antiA. Many-Others moving reversely from the supposed next position «γ» to «β» and «α»). The speed of the moving-One on axis A-antiA, from position «α»  to position «β» being considered as the smaller leaping distance, is astronomically smaller from the speed of Many-Others reversely moving to consist the moving-One. (If we imagine the moving-One as a photonic quantum and the Many-Others  as sub-quantum  elements  of  a deeper existing level, then the so called leaping removal, is the result of an almost instantaneous collapsing-composing process of the One, by the moving Many-Others. These Many-Others, though have enormously different speed, moving reversely and in different levels, coincide inter-terminating, inter-composing each other).  In this case, a paradoxologist would say that one system moves from past to future and the other from future to past.  From a quantic point of view though, it is possible “time not to exist this way”; because world is οnly Now and real time is the frequency of the repetition of passing elementary points in position. (Since space is the length of the points wave spread).

31. Positions should receive-emitting, a consequence of gradually alternating angle coursing-anticoursing units, having as a result a rotation. This rotation is terminated by the responding relation of receipt-emitting-coursing-anticoursing points in every position. This rotation departs as paracentric, since its emission on the “coursing-anticoursing” scale should be singular (of one element) and its receiving is almost infinite at pole A, but after passing by all possible relating positions of emission-receiving-receipt-emitting on axis A-antiA, its paracentral character tends to be in balance until the centre of the hypothetic sphere, (having axis and poles A-antiA); after wards balance will gradually again be disordered reaching pole antiA, where it will be completely paracentral. All positions however, appear externally balanced, because the receipt-emitting of coursing elements disorder will be balanced by the responding disorder of the anticoursing elements. These positions differ its other, to the coursing-anticoursing relation frequency, having a responding angle of rotation, in relation to their position in axe A-antiA of the hypothetic sphere.
32. Micro (very small), which we could name «point», expands far away to Mega (great, universe) and Mega dives into Micro, being together One (a unit). The deepest limits of the inside coincide to the faraway limits of the outside, composing the contradictive unity.    Events consist by an unconstrained number of this kind of points. Everyone of these points, departing for universe, returns verifying partially its moving self. This event referring simultaneously by a different way to all universe scales, expresses by these receipt-emitting process, its own view of all universe faces. Any position of these flow-antiflow scales, emits to universe, receiving from it messages, being a specific emit-receiving message cod. A scale consisting of this kind successive positions, begins from the position of higher receipt and lower emission, passes gradually by all possible positions of different relation emission-receiving messages and ends to position of lowest receipt and higher emission messages.  
       Every position, responding to all these different scale point departures, even the instantaneous one, is able this way to change itself, emitting gradually to universe all possible messages, responding differently to all scales. These begin from the message which  never  departed,  because it is  always  there,  passes from all gradual series of departure-returning messages with a different point of flow-antiflow relation to universe, ending to the message which will never return. (We have noticed that both messages, “the one being always there and the one which never returns”, compose the contradictive unity of the “instantaneous-immobility and infinite-zero”, being the positions of A-antiA poles) This way, the event we call point in universe, sends an unconstrained number of messages, changing continuously its emitting-receiving code, to maintain its own position and simultaneously changes continuously position, to maintain its own receipt- emission code.    

33.  This could be expressed differently:  the One and Unique consists of the anti-course of Many-Others (flowing in position of One) and simultaneously, Many-Others consist of the course of the One (anti-flowing in Many-Others positions).   
       Many-Others are accomplished by the One and One by Many-Others, composing  together the Whole. This way the course of the moving-One to sequent positions, is a collapsing-compositive result of Many-Others anticoursing (in the position of the One), realising-verifying it; and the One returns its dept to Many-Others, realizing-verifying gradually all of them.
     [Because universe is infinite and open system, every message that departs from a position to the universe, returning back, do not verify absolutely its departing  position (as we have noticed), but it verifies-falsifying it.  This because the returning message «steps» upon the departure position, verifying it gradually from more to less, going finally farther from the departing spot. This way the moving-One exists as a  collapsing-compositive even in a continuous changing position].  
     That we call «point» in universe, on one hand, moves being continuously the same,  (changing scale,  being able to verify  a similar One-Other  in a different scale); on the other hand it collapses-composing, at the same scale and moves changing continuously its position by changing its emission-receiving code. This way a moving point (an event), is a constant and distinguished spot but simultaneously an expanding cloud.
     We could imagine both of these situations together, as a cloudy «one stroke of the pencil line» having a solid “nose”, but moving, leaves back an elliptic and gradually  expanding to the universe cloud.  That «point-event», moving eternally, verifies-falsifying all the spots of its “tail”, being simultaneously verified-falsified by them.

34. Therefore that we could name «opposite» from a contradictive point of view, is the unconstrained universal plurality, formed in relation to the unity the One-event represents.  The opposite to any specific-One, cannot be expressed as minus-One, but as an unconstrained series of similar and gradually differing from the One events. These depart very deeply from inside the specific-One, without leaving any independent «space» and travelling faraway out of the One, accomplish an unconstrained number of depart-returning courses, which verify-falsifying them selves,  compose this an unconstrained contradictive moving relation as opposite to the One.  Everyone of all these similar and unconstrained number of units, existing simultaneously in this relation, could be accepted as a distinguished scale of positions, which during this contradictive process of opposites as simultanea, must be considered as a distinguished departure position.  This way we have Two, Three, Four… etc,  (distinguished events and arithmetic numbers).

35. As a consequence of the previous prepositions, we could imagine our world, as a whole, consisted of such an elementary «junction plot» positions. Everyone of these positions sends specific messages of departing-returning, flow-antiflow, emission-receiving, so it would be considered as a distinguished event.  The state and position of such events, consist by a distinguished «plot» of flowing-antiflowing-receipt-emission of under-events, which could be characterized as energy for these specific positions-existences (events) of that plot. So if anyone of these events receive energy (flowing of under-events), more than a necessary quantity, (it should be to another  specific  position  of  that  plot);  this collapses entering to the under existing energy flowing-antiflowing level (the under-event level) and it is recomposed to another position, justified by the new flowing-antiflowing-emisson-receipt, of the under-events state of the structure-plot. By this concept, the world should be a plot of an unconstrained number of messages interchanging positions. This message plotting, could be the worlds evolution process as essence and its operation would be the Dialectic Logic.

36.  By means of a dialectico logic formality, “Identity” would be considered as an evolving self-overpassig event, like the contradictive unit i have presented. This way the “Identity Principal”, the so much necessary for the “Comparative Process” of logic, will turn to be “Principal of the Contradictive Identity”. This identity, which will be an evolving process (as we have described), to be functional in logic, its amplitude will be confined by the kind of research and the kind of involving units which demanded by the responding departures to the responding scales.  This abstractly could be said, that every specific moment of this process would be a species of differential collapsing-compositive operation.  This way the typical logic formality is overpassed, getting a living dimension.  
37.   For such a contradictive logic process to be possible, some ideal index recording boards must be contacted. These would be such as i tried to propose terminating the idea of contradiction scales of “emit-receiving-coursing-anticoursing messages plot” in this work. It’s necessary, these boards to be contacted with mathematic support, based on a Contradictive Geometry, i have sketched previously; this research process should also be related to the research limits of a specific event. These record-boards must define the possible flowing-antiflowing receiving-emission messages of the contradictive crossing position plot, which will represent a current and specific reality. This way, the removal from a crossing plot position to another, will be the result of a collapse-composing process, as it will be revealed by the ideal operation of the supposed record-boards (the crossing plot, flowing-antiflowing, positions system).
      I talk about ideal function and hypothetic recording boards, because we will never have an immediate experimental approach, at least the way we used to, because this evolving process is taking place in the so called unter-quantic world, which can not absolutely be investigated. We should use hypothetic models and notice if these could be verified in levels we have experimental approach.

38. The contradictive unite, i speak about, could take a specific meaning every time its hypothetic departing position in the scale of a specific reference is determined; This reference would serve the specific research. That departing position of a specific reference system, simultaneously could be related to all other unconstrained number of moving points, in other systems of reference (scales), by a different way everyone  to a different scale.
    All these simultaneously departing points, travel-returning to universe, or positions emit-receiving messages, verify-falsifying all the positions of the other scales, except of the simultaneously departing positions of the other relating scales. Then every unique departure point of a specific relation systems scale, which cannot be verified from all this process, could be One, Two, Three…etc, and generally the numeral departure counting of other contradictive units.  (We should not forget that all these units appearing as autonomous and independent, when they «touch» the position of Poles in a scale (A antiA), bring back to the surface the instantaneous and immobile element, which is the contradictive unity of the whole).
39. After this concept we have spoken about, a rational and organized process could be supposed.  This should be related to departure positions, specific systems of scale references during a specific research and the way departure-returning messages, would behave.  That would be Dialectics.

                               EPILOGUE

40. This imaginary adventure of One point moving rectilinearly and normally, in all its development, could be the characterisation of a “Contradictive Elementary Unit”. Although the way i have proposed it, does not look as a perfect one, the reader should have in mind, that deals about contradictive meanings, stepping many times simultaneously on the negation and the affirmation of thinking.  Never the less, if science and Logic do not take under consideration this preposition about the meaning of this conytradictive- dialectic unit or another work of that kind, -maybe better proposed-, will never be able to overpass the dialogic impasse, it has been trapped. Having that under consideration, the language of science will coincide to Contradictive Geometry language, where world should be accepted as a Bio-chartographic recording, the way this language demands.  There will also be a logic syntax that takes in consideration and have as basic term the Contradictive Elementary Unit, as it has been proposed by Zeno and the dialectic mental structures of the Heracleitic thinking, which i have reformed in this preposition. Mathematics, physics, biology, medicine and all sciences, should be «seen» again and reconsidered, having in mind the Contradictive Elementary Unit and the Contradictive Geometry Biochartography of the world. This way, science will be One, –«Philosophy»–. So it will coincide to the Contradictive Rationality Language, which is Dialectico as essence; ―The Heracleitian «Logos».
41. We could re-determinate the principles of a Dialectico Logic formality, stepping on the contradictive elementary unit. This way we could form three principles of the Dialectico Logic:
A. «The Principle of Dialectic Identity» where identity coincides with the Contradictive Unite, as it has been proposed during this work.
B.  «The Contradictive Relativity Principle of the Opposites», which we have terminated in the contradictive opposition meaning.
C.  «The Amphidromic Rationality Principle», being a both way Rational Activity Chain, presupposing Reason and Result to be intercollapsing-intercomposing each-other having an unconstrained number of dimensions, which end to the instantaneous-immobility, nihil and infinite, (the contradiction nude and the potentiality). In this principle, rationality is considered to be a departure-returning evolving process, as it has been terminated previously during this work.
42. These principles worth only as operative tools in specific situations and contain a meaning concentration of all the previous work, which should be considered in the development for every specific case, but not as a formal stereotypes.
43. As we have noticed, Logic and Aesthetics are recorded in the human hereditary mechanism and Conscience is the de-codified part of this recording. This recording do not constrain the human notion and behaviour, because being contradictive is unconstrained and multi-dimensional.

44. This imaginary adventure of the normally and rectilinearly moving point, let be considered by the reader as a contradictive cognitive game.  
     This preposition could claim a scientific face, as “The Anatomy of Contradiction”.
45. The preposition and use of the Contradictive Logic, for centuries, was accepted as a cognitive game and it would stay this way, since rationalism departing from Aristotle, till the time of Newton has taken the position of Logic itself in our conscience. Rationalism as determinism and typical logic, being reinforced with differential and integral mathematics and with the necessity of the electronic computer, which is indeed an instrument of rationalism typicality, had puss away contradictive dialectic logic.   With the appearence though of the “relativity theory” and the “quantic theory”, this situation has been violently reversed.
46.   For the above reason we must not forget the notation of the great scientist and humanist Bohm: Every motion in the quantomechanics “Fields Theory”, is described as a collapsing-composition of the moving elementary units. . . . The motion of a free particle is described as destructiuon of that in one position and creation of another in other position.
      This realisation looks so much with the collapsing-composition of the presocratic dialectics, that brings back Contradictive Thinking and Dialectic Logic in the front of the stage.   Dialectic Logic is not anymore a logical game, but a door to the future.     

                                             space and time
From a contraductive and a collapsing-compositive point of view, because things are always Other-Different and in other position, neither Time could be duration nor Space extension.    In that ultimate level of the world which could be the quandic one, time is the repetition friquency of under events in position and space is their wave length.  So Time, Space, Speed and Being in that level of the world are very different from the newtonian and aristotelian concept. The relativity theory though and the equasion of Shroediger do not take under consideration this fact and intermix the newtonian space and time with quantic time and space (frequency and wave leanth) in the same calculations. Morover these theories do not consider the speed is not the same as in the newtonian world. That being logically illegal creates in specific cases logical problems.

                                            a final notation
The world is a dynamic process having contradictive nature being in a continuance  of  evolving  process  and  for  this  reason, it needs a contradictive rationalism to be described. Science should consider my prepositions about the Contradictive Elementary Unit and the Contradictive Rationality, as it is propossed in that logic tractatus, or other works maybe better propossed about that matter, because it will not be able to forword theoritically any more.
      It is nessecary new mathematicians and thinkers to take under consideration this work and to depart for a long jurney to the unknown.   They must create a new mathematic logic instrument which should step upon the collapsing-compositive “tablets” I have hypotheticaly proposed.  Then all sciences will be in another theoretical base which will consider the “collapsing-compositive” nature of the world and will be organizes again.


This work was not understood by the english inrerpreters I was adressed to, so I transilated it by myself though the level of my english knowledge is very low.  This english vertion though, being an aproximate one to the greek prtotype, gives the general meaning.